Archive for the ‘government’ Category

NU’s Center for Sport in Society on Importance of K-12 Sports Programs

January 16, 2010

By Michael Hill

There is little doubt that sports play a pivotal role in the lives of America’s youth. In building social skills, maintaining physical health, and providing young people with a passion they can pursue, the importance of school sports is hard to deny.

So what happens when the opportunity for youths to participate in sports is jeopardized?

In recent months, Boston public schools have had to make difficult choices in their spending to protect their sports programs. Although Boston has found a potential solution to protect sports programs, other cities have been less fortunate.

Taryn Provencher is project coordinator for Urban Youth Sports for Northeastern University’s Center for Sport in Society. With years of experience in youth sports, she says of the importance of sports in youth’s lives: “Getting involved has always been a respected activity in our nation, but it starts out as a great opportunity to get physically active and interact in a safe social scene. The interaction in this scene argues to keep youths out of trouble and involved in healthy programming.”

In June, the Boston Globe published a seven- part series about the severity of Boston public schools’ financial standing for school sports. In the final part of the series, the Globe reported that Mayor Thomas M. Menino would introduce a new multimillion-dollar charitable foundation to work to protect sports programs for Boston’s student athletes.

The program, introduced in August, is expected to hire staff, recruit board members, and begin to improve the public school system one sport at a time. The program plans to host charitable events, such as school fairs, and is projected to increase the Boston public schools’ annual sports budget to $6.5 million from $4 million in the next three calendar years. That’s a more than 60 percent increase from the city’s current public school sports budget, the Globe reported.

“It’s a new renaissance for the athletic and academic programs in the Boston public schools,’’ Menino told the Globe. “These kids need help, and we’re going to give them that little extra to make sure they’re successful.”

Provencher said she is worried about other cities that are not taking immediate action to protect their public school sports programs. She said obesity and losing the ability to understand the significance of setting goals and working as a team are potential consequences of schools cutting sports programs.

Provencher said there is a need for more part-time physical education teachers and after-school coaches, as a simple yet effective solution for creating ample opportunities for America’s youths to participate in sports.

“There are many people that would be willing to take advantage of the option to work part-time to run activities and sport for youth,” Provencher said. “Our volunteer base is a lot more active in present day as well, and utilizing volunteers, even if it were once a week, is better than nothing.”

At Northeastern University, student athletes get involved at least once a week to help Boston public school students, both physically and academically, through athletic activities and peer tutoring. Although it is a small effort in a big picture, the commitment from the student athletes not only helps youths gain an improved sense of self-esteem by learning and keeping physically fit, but the simple reassurance that somebody cares about them is enough to motivate youths to strive to work hard and think more highly about their own education, Provencher said.

According to its Web site, Northeastern’s Center for Sport in Society is considered the world’s largest social justice organization that uses sport to create social change. Since 1984, the nonprofit organization has promoted physical activity, health, violence prevention, and diversity among young people and professional athletes.

Michael Hill is an undergraduate student in the Northeastern University School of Journalism.

BOSTON CITY COUNCIL RE-ELECTS COUNCILOR MICHAEL P. ROSS TO SECOND TERM AS PRESIDENT

January 5, 2010

The following press release was sent out by Councilor Ross’s office this afternoon:

Boston—In its first meeting of 2010, the Boston City Council unanimously re-elected President Michael P. Ross as President of the body. At the meeting, Ross praised the Council for its work in 2009 and urged them play a leadership role in addressing the current fiscal crisis as well as the City’s future potential for growth and vitality.

“I am proud of all the Council accomplished in 2009, and I know that we can work with Mayor Thomas Menino to tackle the challenges we face head-on. Boston has never been afraid to innovate, and this is how we will continue to strengthen our city in the year ahead,” Ross said. “We must answer the urgent call of the present but also raise our gaze above the horizon because the City Council is at its best when it thinks ahead of a crisis and imagines a greater Boston.”

Ross outlined several initiatives he intends to roll out over the course of 2010. In particular, he expects to convene some of the best minds from science, industry, the arts and education to advise the Council on what Boston must do to compete effectively, attracting and retaining the most skilled talent. In addition, he encouraged the Council to become an active part of the conversation on education reform currently taking place in response to President Obama’s Race to the Top initiative.

Hubie Jones, Dean Emeritus of the Boston University School of Social Work and a leader on education reform was in attendance at the Council meeting. “We cannot lose another generation when skills are so important to future success,” Jones said. “It is critical that our non-profit service organizations achieve excellent results for the children they serve. We welcome the support of civic and political leadership in establishing a place-based program like the Harlem Children’s Zone to achieve better results for our youth. I applaud Mike Ross for his leadership on this issue and look forward to working with him.”

Boston City Council – Hearing on Rat Infestation – Nov 30

November 17, 2009

Image from desertpeace.wordpress.com

The following announcement is posted for the Boston City Council:

The Boston City Council’s Committee on City and Neighborhood Services will hold a public hearing on Monday, November 30, 2009 at 1:00PM in the Christopher Iannella Chamber, fifth floor, Boston City Hall.

The subject of the hearing is:

1259 – Order for a hearing to discuss what is being done to manage the rodent problems in the City.

This matter is sponsored by Councilors, Murphy, Flaherty, LaMattina, Linehan, Yancey, Turner, Feeney, Ciommo, Ross and was referred to the Committee on City and Neighborhood Services on 10/7/2009.

Members of the public are cordially invited to attend and testify. Please bring fifteen (15) copies of any written documentation you wish to present at the hearing. If you know of others who may be interested in this hearing, kindly notify them. Written comments may be made part of the record and available to all Councilors by sending them by email, fax or mail to arrive before the hearing, please use the address below.

For the Committee:

Salvatore LaMattina, Chair
Committee on City and Neighborhood Services

If you can’t make it to the hearing but would still like to submit information, contact Juan Lopez in one of the following ways:

Mail Address: Attn. Juan Lopez-Docket 1259 – Boston City Council, Boston, MA 02201
Fax Number: (617) 635-4203 Attn: Juan Lopez -Docket 1259.
Telephone Number: (617) 635-3041
Email Contact: juan.lopez@cityofboston.gov

Announcement – City Councilor Turner Thanks His Supporters

November 10, 2009

We got this message 6 days ago, but misplaced it in the post-elections shuffle:

Councilor Turner released the following message to his supporters:

November 4, 2009

Dear Supporters,

I am thrilled to have won such a landslide victory in yesterday’s
District 7 City Council race. I view this victory not only as a
mandate to continue my leadership as Councilor but also to continue my
fight to prove that former US Attorney Sullivan tried to publicly
humiliate and jail me despite his knowledge that I am innocent.

Now that my continuation as the District 7 Councilor is assured, I
will focus my attention on disposing of the government’s bogus case.
As long as the question of my guilt or innocence is unresolved, I will
not be able to serve as a Chair of any Council Committee based on a
ruling by the Council President. Thus to eliminate this impediment to
my service I have directed my lead lawyer, Barry P Wilson, to prepare
a motion to dismiss the charges.

I have also instructed him to take whatever steps necessary to secure
the “so called evidence” that the government claims to have. I
continue to believe that the government’s demand that I give up my
freedom of speech in order to receive “their evidence” is an
outrageous denial of justice. However, my lawyers advise me that their
ability to see the “evidence” strengthens their ability to prove
former US Attorney Sullivan joined the historic pattern of government
persecution of black elected officials by basing his case on his
political desires not on the pursuit of justice.

Since receipt of the “evidence” will limit my ability to discuss the
particulars of the case, I will focus my discussion in the court of
public opinion on US Attorney Sullivan –his history, his objectives,
and his relationship to the press. It is amazing that the Boston media
has focused so little attention on former US Attorney John Ashcroft’s
bankrolling Sullivan’s future despite the profile of Sullivan as a
weak, somewhat inept US Atty.

In closing, let me thank all of you who supported me during the
darkest moment of my life. Without your support, I would not have
survived the early assaults and certainly would not have had the
strength and courage to persevere despite the odds and the attacks. I
am truly indebted to you all. Let me end by publicly thanking Terri,
my wife, for her love and faith which has served as a shield against
the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.

Sincerely,
chuck

CDC Bids Its Last Goodbye to Former Director

November 9, 2009

Carl Nagy-Koechlin (center) receives
an official Citation from State Senators
Sonia Chang-Diaz and Steve Tolman. Image
by Sajed Kamal

by Stephen Brophy

In the ever-practical spirit of Carl Nagy-Koechlin, former director of the Fenway Community Development Corporation (FCDC), the FCDC decided to combine his formal going-away party with a fundraiser. So last Tuesday, Nov 3, close to 100 Fenway citizens and their friends gathered at the Susan Bailis Assisted Living House on Mass. Ave. and St. Botolph St. (an FCDC project) to share food and drink and wish Carl a fond farewell (after begging him to reconsider).

State Senator Steve Tolman set the tone for the evening as he and his fellow Senator presented Nagy-Koechlin with a proclamation – if Tolman ever decides to give up his day-job, he would make an excellent stand-up comedian. All of the elected officials who came after him, including State Rep. Byron Rushing and City Council President Mike Ross tried to achieve his comedic heights – they didn’t quite make it, but entertained the audience all the same.

Laughter was liberally mixed with many other sentiments as people spoke of the pleasure and inspiration they got from working with Nagy-Koechlin over the years. Councilor Ross remembered that during his first run for City Council he had lunch with Carl outdoors at Thornton’s, and during the lunch someone came by and hissed at him. Carl shrugged it off and said “that’s just someone from Fenway Civic Association.” Flash forward ten years, and Ross is lunching with on of the Fenway Civic officers. Ross says “did you hear that Carl Nagy-Koechlin is leaving the CDC” and was answered by “we were just starting to get along!”

One of the highlights of the evening happened when Nagy-Koechlin introduced his mother and two of his brothers to the crowd. He spoke movingly about how his parents had inspired him by their commitment to helping people in communities poorer than their own. “Other kids rebelled against their parents – I just did the best I could to follow in their footsteps,” he said.

A personal highlight for this reporter came from meeting the architect who designed the Bailis House, Alfred Wojciechowski, AIA. I remember back in the 1970s during the days of struggle against the “Fenway Urban Renewal Project” that the parcel of land on which it stands was considered undevelopable for anything other than a high-rise. It was a vacant lot with a slope at least as steep as that up the street at Mass. Ave. T Stop, where the sidewalk looms high above the neighboring park.

Wojciechowski managed to create a building that matches its surroundings, provides some parking for its neighbors, and is a great place to have a party, while incidentally housing people who need more than the normal amount of assistance as they move through their days. Thanks to Alfred, and to the CDC, for coming up with such a beautiful solution for such a seemingly insoluble problem!

CANDIDATE PLATFORM: Tito Jackson

November 3, 2009

Fenway News asked the At-Large candidates to answer three questions regarding Community-Based Planning, the Community Center and Affordable Housing. Each candidate was also allowed to mention other issues important to their campaign.

Here are Tito Jackson’s responses:

See a larger version: http://fenwaynews.org/media/jackson/
Read the full written response: http://fenwaynews.org/pdf/jackson.pdf

Every City election year, the Fenway News asks the final 8 At-Large City Council candidates a set of questions regarding concerns of voters in the Fenway. We print them in a special spread a month before the election, along with photos provided by the candidates. This year for the first time we can also offer candidates more space on Fenway News Online to answer other questions or make other arguments for their election. Here are this year’s questions:

COMMUNITY-BASED PLANNING
Several of the candidates talk about a community based planning process. What does this mean? Will each neighborhood create an elected council?

As City-Councillor at Large, one of my key objectives would be to work to build partnerships that include every resident of Boston. One element of achieving this is to ensure that residents are fully engaged as citizens, and a community-based planning process could be an effective tool towards this end. I support the development of community-based councils that would act as full partners in City-level planning processes. I believe that these councils would be most accountable to their respective communities if membership is determined through a full democratic election, though I acknowledge that in the short-term, appointments may be a necessary interim step.

A critical issue in establishing an effective civic partnership with each Boston resident is making sure that all Boston communities have equitable access to our municipal government. A community-based planning process rests on the premise that well-defined communities can be identified, and the boundaries for these communities are most likely to follow existing precinct and district boundaries. Boston has not engaged in a thorough re-drawing of precincts since the 1920s, and our neighborhoods have changed substantially since then. It is our responsibility to make sure that all residents have equal access to the democratic political process. Any effort to develop legislation in support of a community-based planning process must be accompanied by an effort to ensure that the constituent communities reflect the demographic realities that currently define the social geography of Boston.

COMMUNITY CENTER
Establishing a Fenway community center has been a priority for many Fenway citizens who have participated n planning exercises and meetings. What would you do to help the Fenway get such a facility?

Every resident of Boston deserves to live in a sustainable neighborhood that provides ample opportunities for social and civic engagement. While many Boston neighborhoods provide attractions that are of city-wide, state-wide, nation-wide, and even international interest, investments supporting these attractions should not come at the expense of facilities of interest to neighborhood residents. A community center such as the one proposed by the Fenway Community Development Corporation as part of its broader Urban Village Plan would not only be an effective use of City resources, but moreover is an example of the advantage of community-level input into the planning process.

While the proposed community center would provide clear benefits for the residents of the Fenway neighborhood, it has the potential to provide benefits to residents of the larger Boston community as well. As an At-Large City Councillor, I would work to develop city-wide support for a center by emphasizing this broader set of contributions. Many if not all of Boston’s neighborhoods would benefit from the development of a sustainable urban village including a vital community center. A community center in Fenway as a pilot project would leverage the hard work of the Fenway CDC and its partners in leading the way towards making all of Boston’s neighborhoods into safer and cleaner places to live. Moreover, the development of a community center as part of a larger development project would create a significant number of environmentally sustainable employment opportunities—all the more so to the extent that the project can be replicated broadly across Boston neighborhoods.

HOUSING
Under Mayor Menno’s inclusionary zoning policy developers of housing must provide some middle income affordable units in their new building (or pay into a fund). Developers of recently built housing in the Fenway have complied, offering one-bedroom units at over $1,400 a month. Do you believe this is affordable? Lower income brackets should also be supplied with affordable housing? If so, how would you change the laws and regulations to insure that ”affordable housing” is actually affordable to lower income Boston residents?

One bedroom units for $1,400 a month are far from affordable for most residents of Boston, and I certainly believe that individuals in lower-income brackets should have access to affordable housing. While Mayor Menino’s Inclusionary Zoning Policy reflected a step in the right direction when it was initially passed, there is substantial room to update this policy to include the needs of a wider range of Boston residents. As an At-Large City Councillor, I would work to expand the range of this program to this effect. In particular, I would support the more full inclusion of community-based input in the planning process in support of this goal.

An additional way to ensure that affordable housing is actually affordable to lower-income Boston residents is to make sure that housing is developed with the needs of low-income residents in the first place. The City of Boston recently made Federal Stimulus funds available to convert unsold foreclosed homes into energy-efficient affordable housing for low-income and homeless families. As a board member for Heading Home, a group dedicated to transitioning homeless families to permanent housing, I see the needs of low-income families first-hand. As City Councillor At-Large, I would ensure that families most in need of affordable housing get access to these converted properties by connecting effective programs such as the Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance to existing City efforts to develop housing.

CANDIDATE PLATFORM: Felix Arroyo

November 3, 2009

Fenway News asked the At-Large candidates to answer three questions regarding Community-Based Planning, the Community Center and Affordable Housing. Each candidate was also allowed to mention other issues important to their campaign.

Here are Felix Arroyo’s responses:

See a larger version: http://fenwaynews.org/media/arroyo/
Read the full written response: http://fenwaynews.org/pdf/arroyo.pdf

Every City election year, the Fenway News asks the final 8 At-Large City Council candidates a set of questions regarding concerns of voters in the Fenway. We print them in a special spread a month before the election, along with photos provided by the candidates. This year for the first time we can also offer candidates more space on Fenway News Online to answer other questions or make other arguments for their election. Here are this year’s questions:

COMMUNITY-BASED PLANNING
Several of the candidates talk about a community based planning process. What does this mean? Will each neighborhood create an elected council?
I am a strong supporter of a community-based planning process. As an elected member for five years of the Jamaica Plain Neighborhood Council, I was able to successfully advocate with and on behalf of my neighbors for new development that is appropriate for our community. Through that experience, I’ve seen that only when communities are a part of the planning process can we ensure that development is beneficial to our neighborhoods, creates jobs, supports local businesses, preserves open space and eliminates blight. As a City Councilor, I will fully support and continue to advocate for the elimination of the Boston Redevelopment Authority. Instead, Boston deserves an independent City Planning Department and elected City Planning Board with representatives from the Fenway and neighborhoods across Boston. The planning and development structure in Boston hasn’t been revisited in more than 40 years, and the city has changed. As your new City Councilor At Large, my staff and I will work diligently over the next year to foster an open, inclusive process that educates the public, engages citizens in informed decision-making and returns neighborhood planning to the people of Boston.

COMMUNITY CENTER
Establishing a Fenway community center has been a priority for many Fenway citizens who have participated in planning exercises and meetings; What would you do to help the Fenway get such a facility?
Certainly, the Fenway community deserves a new community center and I will support Fenway’s citizens in furthering the creation of a community center at every opportunity. Especially for the area’s senior population, a safe place is needed that provides activities and meeting spaces for the residential community. Generally, I will work to support the “urban village” approach and the Fenway CDC’s vision for the Fenway neighborhood’s growth into the 21st century. As a City Councilor, I will work with Councilor Ross and the neighborhood’s state legislative representatives to support carefully planned development of the Fenway that helps foster “smart-growth” to foster a transit-oriented residential neighborhood in the heart of the City of Boston that is welcoming to the broadest spectrum of residents. As detailed above, as a City Councilor At Large, I will seize every opportunity to support community planning efforts and to promote development that is consistent with the neighborhood’s vision. It is crucial that our neighborhoods and their residents play the leading role in deciding the future development of Boston.

HOUSING
Under Mayor Menno’s inclusionary zoning policy developers of housing must provide some middle income affordable units in their new building (or pay into a fund). Developers of recently built housing in the Fenway have complied, offering one-bedroom units at over $1,400 a month. Do you believe this is affordable? Lower income brackets should also be supplied with affordable housing? If so, how would you change the laws and regulations to insure that ”affordable housing” is actually affordable to lower income Boston residents?
$1,400 a month is not “affordable” to lower income Boston residents and will not provide the opportunity we should be ensuring for working families to live in our City. First, we have to ensure that whenever housing is being built that we also build affordable housing so that everyone in our city has the opportunity to live here. In Boston, more than 20,000 households are on a waiting list for affordable rental housing and there is an obvious an clear need to create rental options for those priced out of Boston’s expensive housing market. We should also not ignore opportunities to create affordable home ownership, since that will help Ultimately, rather than address “affordability” on a case-by-case basis and in individual battles with the Boston Redevelopment Authority, I believe an independent City Planning Department is needed. Only with this important reform can Boston finally integrate planning for jobs, housing, environmental protection, transportation and business development. A planning department and elected City Planning Board could take on these issues in a way that is accountable to the City Council and responsive to our constituents through oversight processes.

CANDIDATE PLATFORM: John Connolly

November 3, 2009

Fenway News asked the At-Large candidates to answer three questions regarding Community-Based Planning, the Community Center and Affordable Housing. Each candidate was also allowed to mention other issues important to their campaign.

Here are John Connolly’s responses:

See a larger version: http://fenwaynews.org/media/connolly/
Read the full written response: http://fenwaynews.org/pdf/connolly.pdf


Every City election year, the Fenway News asks the final 8 At-Large City Council candidates a set of questions regarding concerns of voters in the Fenway. We print them in a special spread a month before the election, along with photos provided by the candidates. This year for the first time we can also offer candidates more space on Fenway News Online to answer other questions or make other arguments for their election. Here are this year’s questions:

COMMUNITY-BASED PLANNING
Several of the candidates talk about a community based planning process. What does this mean? Will each neighborhood create an elected council?

Boston needs a planning process that advances thoughtful, complete development plans that will contribute to the City’s economic growth, job creation, and aesthetic appeal, thereby preserving the highest quality of life in our neighborhoods and making Boston more livable.  Community-based planning is a transparent bottom-up process that encourages broad civic participation. It is designed around the reality that Boston residents are close to neighborhood issues, and are the best equipped to clearly identify community needs and to advocate passionately for local concerns. Community-based planning is neighborhood based and consensus driven and recognizes that Boston’s development plans should benefit from the insights, knowledge, and support of local residents. Usually these models focus on ensuring that certain goals are met in the planning process, such as providing a livable design, community cooperation, good public education options, and sustainable economic development strategies. This community-based planning approach can be seen in Fenway CDC’s resident-created Urban Village Plan, a smart growth vision for making the neighborhood more diverse and sustainable.

Not all community based planning models utilize an elected council for each neighborhood, although that is an option to be considered. For example, New York City, which uses a community-based planning model, has fifty nine community boards whose members are appointed by the Borough President with input from the City Council. These boards have up to fifty members who reside in, have a business, professional, or other significant interest in that community and represent all segments of the community.

COMMUNITY CENTER
Establishing a Fenway community center has been a priority for many Fenway citizens who have participated in planning exercises and meetings; what would you do to help the Fenway get such a facility?

Although the Fenway has active neighborhood and civic associations, including Fenway CDC and Mission Hill/Fenway Neighborhood Trust, the area lacks the most basic community facilities. Every neighborhood should have a community center to support the needs of residents and families. These centers are an important resource as they provide essential services to supplement a neighborhood’s schools, health centers, senior organizations, and non profits. Community centers bring neighbors together by inviting those from varied socio-economic and cultural backgrounds to participate in an array of essential programming. They also provide much needed space where members of community organizations and non profits can gather and hold meetings.

I support Fenway’s efforts to fund and build a community center. As City Councillor I will advocate for any comprehensive proposals and will look for ways to support innovative funding ideas that would appropriate capital for the project.

HOUSING
Under Mayor Menno’s inclusionary zoning policy developers of housing must provide some middle income affordable units in their new building (or pay into a fund). Developers of recently built housing in the Fenway have complied, offering one-bedroom units at over $1,400 a month. Do you believe this is affordable? Lower income brackets should also be supplied with affordable housing? If so, how would you change the laws and regulations to insure that ”affordable housing” is actually affordable to lower income Boston residents?

My vision for One Boston is a livable city with safe, affordable, and sustainable neighborhoods defined by a world class public school system and known as the greenest city in the world. This requires a commitment to true affordable housing that provides options for people from all walks of life, including lower income brackets. In the Fenway, we must preserve affordable housing by protecting existing affordable units that are scheduled to revert to market-rate under expiring contracts and work with developers and neighborhood associations to ensure the creation of additional affordable opportunities. I will work with the city and state agencies, community development corporations, and financial institutions to preserve these units. If we do not protect our existing affordable housing stock, our efforts to add new units will be rendered moot.

I also believe that we should prioritize mixed-use/mixed-income development that combines retail and residential uses linked to public transportation. This smart growth model of development is one way to ensure vibrant, diverse and accessible communities. Our communities should reflect the socio-economic diversity of our city, which is the best way to create stable and sustainable neighborhoods. All development, no matter what type, should have a minimal impact on the environment and be as energy efficient as possible.

CANDIDATE PLATFORM: Steve Murphy

November 3, 2009

Fenway News asked the At-Large candidates to answer three questions regarding Community-Based Planning, the Community Center and Affordable Housing. Each candidate was also allowed to mention other issues important to their campaign.

Here are Steve Murphy responses:

See a larger version: http://fenwaynews.org/media/murphy/
Read the full written response: http://fenwaynews.org/pdf/murphy.pdf


COMMUNITY-BASED PLANNING
Several of the candidates talk about a community based planning process. What does this mean? Will each neighborhood create an elected council?

In my opinion community based planning is already happening in the neighborhoods of Boston. What it means, in my opinion, is that the neighborhood groups have a say in the development that happens in their neighborhoods. Do we need something new added to what is already being done? I don’t necessarily think so. I think it is vitally important for the community to provide input on projects in their neighborhoods and I think that is done successfully.

COMMUNITY CENTER
Establishing a Fenway community center has been a priority for many Fenway citizens who have participated n planning exercises and meetings.; What would you do to help the Fenway get such a facility?

The Fenway CDC has been working on this issue for a long time and is in the process meeting with elected officials and developers on creating a Senior Center for the Fenway neighborhood, which I support fully. I will stand with the CDC and the Fenway Civic Association, which I also understand supports a Senior Center, when a community approved project is presented to the City for zoning and licensing purposes. Prior to that I am always available to make phone calls and/or write letters of support to developers on behalf of the CDC. I would be willing to use my resource to solicit funding from private partners.

HOUSING
Under Mayor Menno’s inclusionary zoning policy developers of housing must provide some middle income affordable units in their new building (or pay into a fund). Developers of recently built housing in the Fenway have complied, offering one-bedroom units at over $1,400 a month. Do you believe this is affordable? Lower income brackets should also be supplied with affordable housing? If so, how would you change the laws and regulations to insure that ”affordable housing” is actually affordable to lower income Boston residents?

I don’t believe that $1400 a month is an affordable rate. I am a strong supporter of affordable housing and believe that thirty percent of all newly built housing should be dedicated as affordable housing units. The problem now is that the developers are using the Greater Boston Median Income index to determine what the affordable rate should be. They should be using the median income for the city of Boston. This must be changed and I will work to make that change a reality.

I recognize how difficult it is for most people to make ends meet and that when it comes between paying rent and eating, most people go without food. I don’t believe anyone should have to go without and I know that we can do better at providing affordable rates so those choices don’t have to be made. I have always worked hard to bring affordable units to all parts of the city and will continue to do that if reelected.

Recent studies have shown that the most important indicator of success in school is the economic status of the classmates one goes to school with. Families that move from poor neighborhood to middle class neighborhoods have better scholarship in schools than do the same sorts of families who stay in poor neighborhoods. What would you do to improve education for Boston students?

I’m not an educator by vocation but my understanding is that some of it may be attributed to limited English language skills. To overcome this I believe we need more early learning centers as well as increased remedial and tutorial offerings at the earliest evidence that students need added services.

The Boston City Council doesn’t have the authority to change the School Department. That’s what the School Committee is charged with. That said, what I can do as a city councilor is work with Superintendent Johnson to bring added resources where available. I can also monitor the department and engage in dialogue to change personnel where needed. As you know, the City Council can oversee the budget and make cuts, though not line items. This is a better question for the Superintendent and/or School Committee members.

What should the City be doing about groundwater depletion, a serious problem in the Fenway and Back Bay?
The city is actively working on the groundwater issue and I am proud to say that I, along with Councilor Mike Ross, brought more money to the Groundwater Trust via the city budget so that they could continue monitoring wells in the city. They have done a great job doing this over the years and have expanded beyond theFenway and Back Bay neighborhoods.

I also led the charge to bring all parties together – city and state agencies – to work on this issue collaboratively. A Memo of Understanding was signed by all parties and to this day city and state agencies work together to make certain that water levels are maintained especially when new construction projects are being built. I think this agreement goes a long way to protect the neighborhoods.

Other issues

I believe we all share a lot of the same issues. Our property taxes keep going up, jobs are scarce, and basic quality of life issues are important to us. That’s why as an at-large city councilor I have been working on changing the PILOT program to offer tax relief. Recognizing my work on this important issue, the Mayor appointed me to the PILOT task force charged with adopting a new policy. Tax fairness is a prime concern for me.

I am also the leader on CORI reform on the Boston City Council and have been for almost five years. I believe we need reform immediately to help out the men and women negatively impacted by an outdated system. I look forward to changes being adopted by the state legislature.

Finally, as a full-time councilor I work with residents on basic quality of life issues day in and day out. From street lights being out to helping people with job and housing placement, I am always available to lend a hand.

In briefest outline I can cite the following as examples of the important public matters that have received my attention and that continue to positively impact the citizens of Boston:

licensing and regulation of dangerous dogs;
licensing and regulation of bike couriers;
mandatory laboratory inspections;
the living wage;
installation and implementation of countdown crosswalks;
fire protection and blasting laws;
first of its kind anti-sweat shop ordinance;
full-time advocacy on zoning and licensing issues.

In the last two year term, I have authored or spearheaded the following initiatives. They include:

regulations requiring timely and proper cleaning of grease ducts in response to the Tai Ho Restaurant fire in West Roxbury;
pension and retirement reforms;
financial disclosure ordinance for city councilors;
supporting the continuation of Park Rangers and mounted police patrols.

I also encourage residents to visit my web site http://www.votestevemurphy.com. Thank you.

CANDIDATE PLATFORM: Andrew Kenneally

November 3, 2009

Fenway News asked the At-Large candidates to answer three questions regarding Community-Based Planning, the Community Center and Affordable Housing. Each candidate was also allowed to mention other issues important to their campaign.

Here are Andrew Kenneally’s responses:

See a larger version: http://fenwaynews.org/media/kenneally/
Read the full written response: http://fenwaynews.org/pdf/kenneally.pdf


Every City election year, the Fenway News asks the final 8 At-Large City Council candidates a set of questions regarding concerns of voters in the Fenway. We print them in a special spread a month before the election, along with photos provided by the candidates. This year for the first time we can also offer candidates more space on Fenway News Online to answer other questions or make other arguments for their election. Here are this year’s questions:

COMMUNITY-BASED PLANNING
Several of the candidates talk about a community based planning process. What does this mean? Will each neighborhood create an elected council?
I studied city planning for my masters in Urban Affairs from Boston University so I love planning. Community-based planning is essential to the city’s vitality. People who are close to neighborhood issues can clearly identify community needs and advocate passionately for local concerns. Community-based planning comes in many forms. It can range from participation in local organizations to the preparation of a comprehensive community-based plan for official adoption. Community-based planning may seek to address a variety of issues including preserving neighborhood character, promoting affordable housing, facilitating new development and/or encouraging local employment. These goals may be pursued through rezoning, local plans and/or task force efforts.

COMMUNITY CENTER
Establishing a Fenway community center has been a priority for many Fenway citizens who have participated n planning exercises and meetings. What would you do to help the Fenway get such a facility?

Much like my participation in Chinatown’s search for a location for a new Library, I would work with residents to find money in the budget to identify possible locations. I would also be a conduit between the community and developers to see if a future development could include the community center.

HOUSING
Under Mayor Menno’s inclusionary zoning policy developers of housing must provide some middle income affordable units in their new building (or pay into a fund). Developers of recently built housing in the Fenway have complied, offering one-bedroom units at over $1,400 a month. Do you believe this is affordable? Lower income brackets should also be supplied with affordable housing? If so, how would you change the laws and regulations to insure that ”affordable housing” is actually affordable to lower income Boston residents?

A one-bedroom unit at over $1,400 a month is not affordable. The problem is, the City of Boston uses the average median income (AMI) for Metropolitan Boston as the reference point for defining “affordable” housing rather than the AMI for the City of Boston. This distinction has profound consequences. Metropolitan Boston contains 127 cities and towns, including the wealthiest towns in the state. The most recent (FY2008) Boston Metropolitan Area estimated AMI at $85,800. By contrast, the estimated AMI for the City of Boston is just $50,200. That said, I would advocate for use of the AMI for the City of Boston as the reference point for all of the city’s housing policies and programs.

MORE QUESTIONS:

What should be done about the aborted construction at the Longwood Center site at Brookline Avenue and Longwood?

I support the administration’s creation of a $400 million load fund to help jumpstart developments like these. Jumpstarting these developments will not only put thousands of men and women back to work, but it will create a local economic stimulus for small businesses that surround the development, and, one finished, create new taxable property.